Lionel Deimel's Web Log

 

Random quick takes by Lionel Deimel
Lionel Deimel  

Subscribe to posts Subscribe to Posts:
[Atom] [RSS] [E-mail notice for church posts]

 

Most Recent Posts
Table of Contents

Previous Posts

What Didn’t Happen
Welcome to my church...
“Schism”
Quick Monday Morning Thoughts
Now what?
A Pittsburgh Lament
The Faith Once Delivered
Congratulations, Bishop Lawrence
One Vestry Takes a Clear Stand
Bishop Salmon’s Solution


Archives

Web Log Home

February 2002
March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
December 2003
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
November 2004
January 2005
May 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008

Web Log Home


Lionel Deimel's Farrago

Home
Commentary
Language Notes
Site Map
Search


This page is powered by Blogger. Why isn't yours?

Copyright © 2002-2008
Lionel E. Deimel, Ph.D.
All rights reserved.


February 09, 2008

What to Call Her

NPR carried a report yesterday of another school shooting, this one at a Baton Rouge vocational school. The reporter rather clumsily explained that the “gunman” in this instance was female. As gender roles in society continue to blur, more obscure holes in our language are exposed.

If a man wielding a gun is a “gunman,” should not a woman in the same role be a “gunwoman”? One would think so, but this is not a standard word, and it seems not only unfamiliar, but clumsy. “Gunman” is short and powerful in a way that “gunwoman” is not. “Shooter” might have been a better word to use, though I suspect that, even in the mind of a confirmed feminist, this does not immediately conjure up a Bonnie Parker.

My first thought upon hearing the report, was that the proper term was “gun moll,” but that actually means something else, usually a (male) criminal’s girlfriend. Bonnie was actually more than just a gun moll to Clyde Barrow. And were Clyde just a pretty boy along for the ride, we wouldn’t have had a name for him either.

What should we call Latina Williams, the 23-year-old who shot two female students before using the gun on herself? I will offer some suggestions, though each one is defective in one way or another; some might be considered quite objectionable. I write them as phrases, but the phrases could be combined into single words: “gun girl,” “gun maid,” “gun gal,” “gun bitch,” “gun dame,” “gun lady,” “gun lass,” “gun babe,” “gun broad,” “gun chick,” “gun doll,” “gun she,” or, most improbably, “gun frail.” Most of these terms rely on slang terms and seem no better than “gunwoman.” Perhaps “gun she” (“gunshe”?) has most potential in this group, though I’m probably being influenced by the familiarity of “banshee.” “Gunlass” might work, if the accent is on the first syllable. Another approach might be using a standard suffix for a female actor. We could balance “shooter” with “shooteress,” “killer” with “killeress.” Somewhat more fancifully, we might coin the term “gunneress.”

Of course, we could write off “gunman” as sexist—like “mailman”—and use “gunperson,” providing the sex of the miscreant more directly, as in the phrase “female gunperson.” I’m not personally keen on this approach, actually. Any other ideas?


Posted by Lionel Deimel at 11:46 PM
Permalink